Abilene Writers Guild Meeting Minutes

June 28, 2007

Center for Contemporary Arts

President Ginny Greene opened the meeting by reminding us that our new year has begun. Our theme this year is Indescribable Scribes of the Abilene Writers Guild. She continued by welcoming the good crowd even though we had lots of rain in Abilene and the surrounding area. Welcomed were Gordon I. Root from Trent (who joined AWG this evening), Harold Biddle, Debra Vasquez (a former member), Terri Huff from Eastland (who is in Abilene a couple times a week), Susan Turner from Rochester, and Bill and Gayla Neal. The folks from Haskell, Eastland, Breckenridge, Winters and Eastland braved high water to attend this meeting!

Brags and Sags.

There was no financial report tonight as our most able treasurer, Gail McMillan, is still spending time taking care of her daughter in Weatherford and driving back and forth. We are all happy to learn her daughter is improving steadily.

New Business –

The new Board was seated in June; the annual planning meeting is Thursday, July 5. Board members will bring food and work until everything is planned for the coming year.

Sue Davis issued a plea for people to sign up to provide refreshments once a year, or she just may volunteer YOU!

Stewart needs a list of books any AWG members are planning to publish through May next year, in order to include this information on Grant proposals.

Karen Witemeyer announced the winners of the June contest, Hot Dogs. There were six good, fun entries:
Ginny Greene: Gourmet Dinner for 8
Jan Carrington: Whiskers – first place
Ruth Sellers: Hot Dog! Let’s Celebrate
Sue Davis: Hot Dog!! – second place
Sharon Ellison: Winnie’s Adventure - third place
Ann Wilder – Hot, Haute, Hawt, Hot Dogs
Our judge was Cindi Rhode, an elementary teacher and proud mother of one of Abilene’s National Merit Scholars.

Nancy Masters encouraged us to get our contest entries in. The odds of winning are great. We need 200 entries to cover our expenses. BE SURE TO FOLLOW THE RULES. Then she encouraged us to pay our dues because we need to pay rent, etc.

Barbara Darnall will be our honoree tomorrow night here at Center for reception then at Paramount, where she will receive an art award representing AWG in Cultural Affairs.

Nancy Masters began the program by telling us, "Everybody’s the program tonight. She reported that in a recent meeting with Baptist General Convention of Texas, it appears that her devotional book will take her a long way. It all started in AWG. When she joined AWG, the membership was 15, 9 members were present at her first meeting and met in homes of member. She worked three part time jobs and a full time job—but wanted to be a writer! She said that over the years she made lots of mistakes, but always learned enough through AWG to keep her writing moving.

Bill Neal, who wrote Getting Away with Murder on the Texas Frontier, which is in its second printing by Texas Tech Press, will present our August program. Watch for the July program to be announced in the newsletter and the Abilene Reporter News, thanks to Karen!

After pairing up, we were given copies of entries from last year’s annual contest that were not returnable to their owners (for various reasons). We were asked to read over the entry quickly, see what the judges comments were and answer the question: Why did these entries lose?
  1. Children’s story. Writer used language inconsistent with story. The story was set up well, then didn’t deliver a satisfactory conclusion. Writer didn’t wrap up his many good points.
  2. Writer used too many I’s while trying to tell about being inspired through experiences. Story wanders from here to Georgia, not consistent in the type of writing. Exceeded the word count. Could be done better in half the number of words. Didn’t follow guidelines.
  3. The thesis was hard to figure out; seemed to be saying defense attorneys are using the language of the law in a mischievous manner and that courts are trying to construe lethal injection as cruel and unusual. However, the examples were disjointed. Too many typos. The writer assumes we know what his opinion is in the opinion piece.
  4. Sweet, but doesn’t paint a picture. Never got anything visual out of it. The writer wrote three poems that totaled 50 lines, but paid only one fee. The poem didn’t flow and the writer didn’t follow the rules.
  5. Premise good, needed more research. Synopsis clinically correct but plain, not compelling. Books are bought by publishers based on a strong synopsis. The writer had a natural ability to spin a story, but repeatedly used words too often.
  6. Historical fiction, -- unable to read through all in the time allowed. Synopsis reads like two different books. Judge suggested that the writer read dialogue aloud to make it more natural. Too many grammatical errors. So much packed in, couldn’t keep up with it, too much going on. Need to concentrate on slowing down and making it more cohesive. Change POV.
  7. Article of general interest. Two main problems. Hard to tell if author was male or female, then it was hard to figure out what he was talking about. It seemed to be about midlife crisis – page 2 – but seemed to sometimes be talking to men, sometimes women with the men. Used pink paperclip.
  8. Didn’t follow the rules. Title was at top and bottom. Seemed to be one long, complete metaphor. The guy bought a wife, she killed herself, then he killed his father with the same knife.
  9. Synopsis – writer’s name was on the synopsis. Should be only on coversheet. First few lines seem like western; at the end, there’s drug cartel. The judge cited terrible punctuation in paragraphs, run-on sentences and the need for commas.
  10. Probably for kids. 2 characters are probably middle school age, one can drive a truck; at the end, a duck can smile and talk. Not realistic. No cohesiveness in characters, dialogue not consistent with little kids. No plot, too much word repetition, clichés overused. Stiff or useless dialogue.
  11. Funny little story, village in Mass, Coldbrain. Good story, kind of humorous. Talked about going to a foreign country---New Jersey. Judge had problem with massive amounts of wasted space between paragraphs and too many hyphens.
  12. Short story for children. Word count (1804) too high. Didn’t follow the rules. Seemed to be written above the age level. Reads like something for young people in middle school. Wordy, lengthy, sweet story about swan and turkey, turkey is supposed to preside over TG ceremonies. Starts with a commentary.
  13. Rhymed poetry, 3, beautiful thoughts expressing nature. Some poetry judges might have overlooked the major flaw. Most are sticklers for sticking with rhyme, don’t start with iambic pentameter then switch meters. The writer’s name was at the bottom of the page --- again, FOLLOW THE RULES.
  14. Not about anything, sentences are great, but there’s no focus, it doesn’t make up to anything. The judge suggested a title change.
  15. Novel. The judge liked the story but described the synopsis as rather boring. Also, the title has nothing to do with the gist of the story.
  16. The judge changed the title. The writing was unorganized. Didn’t capitalize a trademark name. Kewpie. The judge said the story should end on page three and that the information on page four was a good topic for another story.
  17. This has a technical-sounding title, but the only thing technical in it when someone pushed the remote control. All corrections in about first 2 pages. Writer should have shut up before the last paragraph. He was reluctant to talk about technology. Maybe not reluctant, ignorant. And the writers used gray paper.
The meeting was adjourned after an enjoyable learning experience. Delicious snacks were provided by Rita Rasco, Mary Ann Smith and Barbara Rollins, and many good discussions were held among members and guests.

Respectfully submitted,



Sharon Ellison
(in cooperation with Barbara Rollins)
Minutes of Previous Meeting
Return to Home Page